Prop 35 Cheat Sheet: Increased Penalties for Human Trafficking

State and federal laws already define two types of human trafficking. Sex trafficking, probably the one most people think of first, includes forced prostitution. The other, labor trafficking, includes forcing an undocumented immigrant to work for free under threat of deportation.

Prop 35 would do several things. First, it would expand the definition of human trafficking to include the production or distribution of child pornography. It would also increase the penalties for all types of human trafficking. The maximum prison sentence for labor trafficking would increase from the current 5 or 8 years (depending on whether a minor is involved) to 12 years. For sex trafficking, it would increase from 5 or 8 years to a maximum of 20 years for adults or life in prison if a minor is involved. If the victim suffered bodily injury, an additional 10 years could be added to the sentence (currently it's only five). For each prior conviction, a defendant could also have an additional 5 years tacked on to the sentence. And anyone convicted of human trafficking would now be required to register as a sex offender.

Under Prop 35, courts could fine anyone convicted of a human trafficking offense up to $1.5 million. That money would have to be spent on victims' support services (70 percent) and on law enforcement activities related to human trafficking (30 percent). It would also require new training for all police, sheriff's department, and highway patrol officers.

Prop 35 would further protect victims. First, a person could not be prosecuted for criminal sexual conduct, such as prostitution, if he or she committed the crime while a victim of human trafficking. Nor could a person's sexual conduct be used to discredit them in court proceedings.

Finally, Prop 35 would require that all registered sex offenders provide information about their Internet service provider and their online identities.

Voting YES means that you would like to increase the penalties for human trafficking and implement the other changes proposed under Prop 35.

Voting NO means that you want to keep California's existing laws regarding human trafficking, no change.

Criminal Defendants: Defendants in human trafficking cases would not be allowed to use a victim's sexual conduct to discredit their characters. If convicted, they would also face having to register for life as a sex offender, and they would face considerably stiffer sentences.

Registered Sex Offenders: Registered sex offenders would have to report additional information about their Internet service providers and online identities. Some convicted criminals who previously would not have been considered sex offenders would have to register for life.

State and Federal Courts: Many human trafficking cases are tried in federal courts, under federal law. According to the legislative analyst, it's actually unclear how much that will change under the new measure.

State and Local Government: Governments could see an increase of a couple million dollars a year for criminal justice costs, in total.

Law Enforcement: Officers would be required to undergo specialized training related to human trafficking. The collective cost of training could be up to a few million dollars up front followed by lower costs each year thereafter.

Victims: Victims would gain some additional protections under the measure, including freedom from prosecution for criminal sexual conduct if it were perpetrated as a result of human trafficking. Some additional revenue would be available for victim services because of the new fines courts could impose. A few million dollars could be raised each year from those fines, though it would obviously depend on how many people were convicted. As of March 2012, only 18 prisoners in the state were there for human trafficking, according to the legislative analyst.

Prop 35 was spearheaded by California Against Slavery and the Safer California Foundation, an organization created by former Facebook Chief Privacy Officer Chris Kelly. Major financial supporters of the measure include Chris Kelly and the Peace Officers Research Association of California

Several principals at Erotic Service Providers Legal, Education, and Research Project, Inc. put together arguments against Prop 35. However, as of Aug. 28, the Secretary of State's Office reports no committees formed to collect contributions for an opposition campaign.

Prop 35 will protect children from sexual exploitation.

It will hold human traffickers accountable for their crimes.

It will help stop the exploitation of children online by requiring sex offenders to provide information about their Internet presence.

This measure actually threatens innocent people by broadening the definition of pimping: anyone receiving financial support from consensual prostitution among adults, including a sex worker's children or spouse, could be prosecuted as a human trafficker. If convicted, they would have to register as a sex offender for life.

The measure could be challenged as unconstitutional for its vague definition of human trafficking that would include the "intent to distribute obscene matter," possibly for "cruel and unusual" punishments including excessive prison terms and fines, and for inhibiting a defendant's right to introduce evidence in defense trials.

It will cost the state even more through increased workloads in probation departments and through new training for police.

Top Photo: A prostitute looks from a window of the "Super Frontera" bar, late on April 21, 2012, during an operation against human trafficking in Guatemala City. | Credit: Johan Ordonez/AFP/Getty Images


Prop 35: Read the Text


Prop 31: Read the Text

LEAVE A COMMENT Leave Comment  


It is awful that in California, traffickers can only serve a maximum of 8 years, which does not allow victims to recover from being ENSLAVED.

Prop 35 doesn't have vague language. In fact, Prop 35 contains almost identical language to the federal human trafficking law which has been successfully used to try human traffickers without infringing on the rights of others. Community leaders, non profits, and police associations have all endorsed Proposition 35. Vote to fight human trafficking in California. Vote Yes on 35!


Whoa! ..not so fast here... We already have way too MANY 'laws' concerning the 'protection of children' and other "trafficked" persons. This 'prop' smacks of a special interest power grab more than an effort to 'protect' anything. You think the state prisons are full now.. just wait until these greedy 'law enforcement' folks step up to the plate with their new-found police powers. Additionally, you think that the California sex registry is bloated and somewhat of an inside joke now, wait until the FLOOD of NEW folks gets on there, diluting the original purpose even further.. and for LIFE! People, we need LESS new laws.. we already have enough as it is. Prop 35 is a very poorly-written piece of trash that needs to be treated as such.

VOTE NO on Prop 35

user-pic are right..."Prop 35 contains almost identical language to the federal human trafficking law which has been successfully used to try human traffickers without infringing on the rights of others". There is already laws to "prevent" these kinds of crimes and still people commit them. More laws are not going to prevent crimes or protect children. It is going to cost the state millions of dollars (that we don't have), its going to pull restitution money that should go to the victims, and it will impede even further on the rights of those sex offenders who are already losing basic human rights. There are hundreds of thousands of registrants who pose no threat to the public (public urination, teenage sex, teenage sexting, false accusations....the list goes on and on). With even more people added to the national registry, it will be even harder to determine who is a danger and who is not. We need laws that will highlight the dangerous people...not bury them even deeper on an ever growing list.

These are the kinds of laws that pull at the heart strings, but have no actual value or practicality. Much like Megan's Law, it will not work until it is reformed.


This law is nothing more than special interest propaganda; the devil is in the details. The overwhelming majority of so-called "human trafficking" cases in America involve adults having consensual sex for monetary compensation (prostitution) or foreigners crossing the border to do the jobs fat, lazy Americans won't do on the cheap, derogatorily called "illegal immigration". So now the law wants to expand to put the spouses and children of "working women" in prison and/on the Megan's Flaw list? Cali's list already has more people than you can fit in the Rose Bowl.

On top of that, they are trying to add a secondary provision expanding registry info to include internet IDs, which are useless and unconstitutional, costing taxpayers millions in unnecessary costs. Prop 35 is more like Crock 35 and anyone with a brain would vote against it. Vote with your head, not your heart.


human trafficking is a high crime, if one of you ever watched "taken" movie which shows how did the criminals did human trafficking and sell them to other persons. take care your daughter and watch the neighborhood around to make sure her safety barbecue gass grills