News and analysis about energy in California with an eye toward renewables.

California Utilities Take Aim at Rooftop Solar

California's three largest investor-owned utilities are renewing their complaints over rooftop solar, according to a story this morning on the business website As more and more homeowners install rooftop solar panels and sell power back to the grid, utilities say they are passing as much as $1.3 billion in costs on to other customers.

Not mentioned by the utilities: the more than $15 billion ratepayers across the state will need to pay to build new transmission lines if we meet the state's renewable energy mandates without rooftop solar.

Story Continues Below
Support KCET

According to the article, the state's three largest investor-owned utilities -- San Diego GHas & Electric (SDG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE), and Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) -- estimate that once the state hits its legal upper limit on net-metered solar, the utilities will be passing along hundreds of millions of dollars in costs to ratepayers without solar panels. SDG&E will be getting $200 million a year from non-solar ratepayers; SCE about $400 million, and PG&E about $700 million.

By comparison, SDG&E's Sunrise Powerlink transmission line, which was built with the ostensible intention of moving renewable energy from Imperial County to San Diego, is being funded entirely by ratepayers to the tune of $1.9 billion dollars. SDG&E isn't griping over that cost to its ratepayers, likely because the utility will likely earn $1.6 billion in total profits on the transmission line over its 58-year expected lifespan.

In 2009, a report by the Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative -- a body composed of agencies and utilities -- forecast that in order to build enough utility-scale renewable energy capacity to comply with California's Renewable Portfolio Standard, the state would have to build $15.7 billion worth of new transmission lines. That was up from $12 billion forecast a couple months earlier by the CPUC. Costs for that new transmission, which will certainly be higher by the time they're actually built, would be borne by ratepayers.

It's understandable that investor-owned utilities are upset about losses due to rooftop solar and other locally owned distributed generation: the explosion in new technology threatens the utilities' business models, much as advances in recording and duplicating technology threatened the music industry's business models.

As Bloomberg reports, the utilities' complaints haven't gotten far:

So far, regulators haven't been sympathetic to utilities' complaints about rooftop solar power. The California Public Utilities Commission rejected in January San Diego Gas's request to impose a "network use charge" that would have added a fee to customers with rooftop solar panels.

But for ratepayers concerned about utility warnings that they may have to foot the bill for someone else's solar panels, consider this: every rooftop solar installation lowers the chance you'll be on the hook for almost $16 billion in transmission lines. And these days, with third party solar leasing firms, you can always just get your own.

ReWire is dedicated to covering renewable energy in California. Keep in touch by liking us on Facebook, and help shape our editorial direction by taking this quick survey here.


The Aesthetics of Design Meets Emergency Backup Power


A Glimpse at What's Coming in the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan

About the Author

Chris Clarke is a natural history writer and environmental journalist currently at work on a book about the Joshua tree. He lives in Joshua Tree.
RSS icon

Add Your Response


The utilities really do have some nerve complaining about wealth redistribution (even feigning concern for low-income ratepayers!) when they are gouging all of us every day by blocking the only successful renewable energy policy in the world in favor of their hugely profitable, wasteful Big Transmission (which also spews huge amounts of hyper-destructive greenhouse gas SF6 into our atmosphere).

No, not the half-baked net metering we have been saddled with, which rewards energy hogs and disenfranchises anyone who bothers to conserve power, I mean feed-in tariffs, which are wildly successful throughout the entire rest of the world.

Seriously, how many more tons of GHGs are we going to let SCE spew into the atmosphere before we demand change?


Hey sheila, I wanna smoke whatever you're smoken so I can think the way I did back in the 60's!


Cloudwalker, please keep your comments substantive and avoid personal attacks on other commenters. If you disagree with what sheila has to say then say what it is you disagree with, and why.