Skip to main content

Solar Group: 'Don't Trust Utilities On Rooftop Solar Costs'

Support Provided By
sun-flower-12-18-12-thumb-600x450-42275

Photo: Lubaib Gazir/Flickr/Creative Commons License

ReWire reported Monday on utility complaints that rooftop solar customers are costing other ratepayers money. Now, a leading California solar advocacy group has weighed in in no uncertain terms, calling utility allegations that rooftop solar panel owners cost other ratepayers money "largely horsemalarkey."


Related

feed-in-tariffs-net-metering

What Are? PACE Loans, Feed In Tariffs and Net Metering

The San Francisco-based advocacy group Vote Solar has posted a blistering rebuttal to the Bloomberg article ReWire noted Monday, accusing California's largest investor-owned utilities of "rushing to derail one of our most important solar programs, and... doing it with some mighty fuzzy math."Vote Solar's post, which doesn't bear a byline, alleges that utilities seem to have "cooked the books" to come up with the total of $1.3 billion that non-solar ratepayers are theoretically paying to cover the costs of solar. Most seriously, Vote Solar charges that utilities' assessment of the amount of solar entering the grid is inflated by somewhere between 50 and 80 percent:

Utilities count all solar energy generated by the net metered customer as a cost that someone else has to pay for...but 50 to 80 percent of that power is used on-site without ever touching the utility's grid. Just like energy efficiency, solar power that's used on-site places no burden on the utility system, and yet utilities are accounting for it as if it's a cost. This is exactly like saying that when a customer turns off her lights, she should have to pay for the power she doesn't use. [Emphasis in original.]

The post also points out that net metering solar customers are usually paid based on a cheaper, lower-tier cost per kilowatt-hour, while utilities report those costs as if they were paid at a higher-tier rate, inflating those costs by another 18 to 40 percent. And the Vote Solar adds that -- as ReWire noted Monday -- the allegations of transferred costs don't account for the benefits from avoiding centralized generation and new transmission lines.

The Bloomberg article didn't cite utility sources for their calculations. Vote Solar points out that its analysis of the utilities' position is based on previous similar statements.

ReWire is dedicated to covering renewable energy in California. Keep in touch by liking us on Facebook, and help shape our editorial direction by taking this quick survey here.

Support Provided By
Read More
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.
A Black woman with long, black brains wears a black Chicago Bulls windbreaker jacket with red and white stripes as she stands at the top of a short staircase in a housing complex and rests her left hand on the metal railing. She smiles slightly while looking directly at the camera.

Los Angeles County Is Testing AI's Ability To Prevent Homelessness

In order to prevent people from becoming homeless before it happens, Los Angeles County officials are using artificial intelligence (AI) technology to predict who in the county is most likely to lose their housing. They would then step in to help those people with their rent, utility bills, car payments and more so they don't become unhoused.