A solar power tower facility proposed for Riverside County would kill or injure more than twice as many birds with its concentrated solar radiation as compared to an existing solar project in San Bernardino County, according to a document published by the California Energy Commission on Friday.
The document, which contains testimony from commission staff submitted as part of upcoming hearings on the proposed Palen Solar Electric Generating System, estimates that the dangerous zone of concentrated solar "flux" around each of the project's two 750-foot power towers would be twice as large as those around the three towers at the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System near the Mojave National Preserve.
That would make each of the Palen towers almost four times as dangerous as their counterparts at Ivanpah, say commission staff, so that even with just two towers compared to Ivanpah's three, Palen would likely pose a 2.5 times greater risk to birds flying near the facility.
A federal laboratory has released its report on hazards from glare at the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in San Bernardino County and the risk that glare poses to aviation in the area. That report isn't good news for those flying between L.A. and Vegas.
ReWire reported in March on complaints from pilots flying near the 390-megawatt solar power tower plant that the facility's tens of thousands of mirrors created intense and potentially hazardous glare that interfered with the pilots' ability to scan the air for nearby aircraft. In that month, Ivanpah's owner Energy Services, a division of NRG Energy, replied to state regulators that the glare was likely caused by mirrored heliostats that had not yet been "calibrated," implying that the issue would be largely fixed once the plant went online.
But a study from the Sandia National Laboratories published on the California Energy Commission website Thursday found that significant and potentially hazardous amounts of glare are created when the facility's heliostats are in what the operators call "standby position," the default position for heliostats not aimed directly at the plant's boilers.
A new study commissioned by the Nevada Public Utilities Commission finds that rooftop solar panel owners taking part in the state's ongoing net metering program won't be raising the electric bills of their non-solar neighbors.
The study, conducted by the San Francisco-based energy consulting firm Energy + Environmental Economics (E3), found that despite dire predictions from utilities in other states, net metering customers in Nevada will have "no substantial impact" on costs borne by non-solar ratepayers.
Instead, net metering customers will allow the state savings of somewhere around $166 million in avoided transmission network and generation costs, all of which would have shown up on Nevadans' electric bills.
A report from the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power suggests that the utility doesn't want to expand one of its most popular rooftop solar programs unless it can charge participants more for using its power grid at night. But unlike its investor-owned counterparts elsewhere in the country making the same argument, LADWP would rather expand a different solar incentive program instead, and that program might well prove more effective in making Los Angeles a solar city.
That's the gist of part of a recent report from LADWP to the City Council, in which the utility's General Manager Marcie Edwards suggests that in order to expand the utility's "net energy metering" program beyond its current cap of 310 megawatts, LAWDP would need to "unbundle" the rate paid to solar customers for energy they put back into the grid. Edwards says that will keep utility customers who don't have solar panels from paying more than their fair share of the cost of maintaining the city's power grid.
The idea that non-solar ratepayers are paying more than their fair share of grid maintenance costs than customers with net metering arrangements has gotten a lot of traction nationwide in recent months, in part due to a push by the Koch brothers' American Legislative Exchange Council to make net metering an issue. Solar advocates point out that rooftop solar actually saves ratepayers money by reducing the need for new power plants and transmission lines. But LADWP may be carving out a third path in the controversy: pushing for an expanded feed-in tariff program as an alternative to net metering.
A Los Angeles city councilman said today he wants to set a goal of dramatically reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Los Angeles by 2050.
Other cities including San Francisco, New York, Toronto, Boston, and Chicago already have committed to cutting emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.
"It's high time Los Angeles did the same," said Councilman Paul Koretz, who joined a coalition of clean energy advocates at City Hall to call for a similar goal in Los Angeles.
Koretz warned that if nothing is done to scale back pollution, environmental disasters such as droughts, floods, and fires could escalate worldwide.
"We have the greatest challenge any generation has ever faced looming before us," Koretz said. "And here, locally, we're in the worst drought in California history -- that's our weather extreme.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is preparing to issue its first-ever take permit to allow for the accidental killing of golden eagles at a California wind facility. Under the terms of the permit, the Shiloh IV Wind Project, a 100-megawatt wind facility in Solano County's Montezuma Hills near Rio Vista, will be allowed to kill up to five golden eagles over a five-year period without incurring penalties under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA).
In return, the project's owners, EDF Renewable Energy, will pay the utility Pacific Gas & Electric to retrofit 133 power poles in Monterey County to reduce the chances that eagles landing on them will be electrocuted. Electrocution from power lines is a significant hazard to eagles and other raptors. USFWS holds that the mitigation will actually result in fewer eagle deaths overall.
The take permit will be valid for five years. USFWS is currently proposing to extend future take permits under BGEPA to 30-year durations, a plan for which they found themselves hauled into court earlier this month.