Skip to main content
Donate

Another deadline for AEG's stadium

By D.J. Waldie
June 10, 2011
Support Provided By

Tim Leiweke is whining again. The AEG's man in Los Angeles is threatening to walk away from the downtown stadium deal if the city council fails to sign off on the stadium's complex financing scheme before August 1. "We will know by July 31, one way or another," he told the Los Angeles Times last week.

Phil Anschutz, the conservative Denver billionaire behind AEG (and who famously keeps his distance from Los Angeles), wants the stadium to complete his privatization of downtown's southwestern corner. By design, the stadium would maroon the city-owned Convention Center on a corporate island from which tourists and convention goers (and their wallets) would never have to leave.

Seen not as a destination in itself but as just another venue, the stadium almost makes sense. It would be another big advertisement for AEG's L.A. Live. And it hardly matters that it would be one of the smallest stadiums in the NFL and certainly the most exclusive. It would be the sports equivalent of a nightclub's VIP room.

Even if the city council approves the financing plan in concept, the stadium's opening day isn't likely until the fall of 2016. That's a year later than Leiweke originally estimated.

So it's getting hard to take Leiweke's ultimatums seriously. And they've become so operatic. Leiweke previously accused the city council of mere timidity. Now he thinks the council members are incompetent. "These 15 folks sometimes don't know how to get out of their own way," he said to the Times reporter.

Presumably, the 15 people who have to agree to a complicated deal that hinges on the city issuing $350 million more in construction bonds will overlook that slap. Given AEG's considerable political juice, a majority of council members will take it and like it.

With no hint of irony, Leiweke thinks the deal's real sticking point isn't incompetence; it's a lack of trust. Leiweke told the Times that NFL owners "don't have a lot of faith" in L.A., and that L.A. "doesn't have faith in the NFL, either."

Leiweke's problem isn't a lack of faith. And it has nothing to do with the relationship between team owners and Los Angeles politicians. Leiweke's problem is the economics of football.

AEG needs a paper commitment from the city council as another bit of leverage with the NFL owners. And it would be good to have the city's commitment soon, before the owners reach a consensus how to resolve their overriding concern - expansion of the league from 32 to 36 teams.

Expansion, not team relocation, was the goal of AEG's negotiations with the league at least since 2009, despite what AEG's Leiweke said. The league doesn't support relocation and sees all 32 markets as viable and capable of delivering new stadiums and other sweeteners to teams said to be willing to relocate. Chatter from team owners about being wooed by AEG is just more leverage for them.

And what's so special about July 31? July 31 is the final date by which a new players' agreement could be signed without canceling games in the fall. Leiweke's deadline isn't about us; it's about the murky business of football.

The "public domain" image on this page was archived by the Library of Congress in 1949.

Support Provided By
Read More
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
By Alejandro Lazo, CalMatters
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
By Alejandro Lazo, CalMatters
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.
By Emma Foehringer Merchant, Inside Climate News