xHgGrtG-show-poster2x3-aXpIxNN.png

Artbound

Start watching
Tending Nature poster 2021

Tending Nature

Start watching
IYhnPQZ-show-poster2x3-Ytk6YwX.png

Southland Sessions

Start watching
RYQ2PZQ-show-poster2x3-OGargou.jpg

Earth Focus

Start watching
5LQmQJY-show-poster2x3-MRWBpAK.jpg

Reporter Roundup

Start watching
E5VnHdZ-show-poster2x3-PrXshoo.png

City Rising

Start watching
QraE2nW-show-poster2x3-uY3aHve.jpg

Lost LA

Start watching
Member
Your donation supports our high-quality, inspiring and commercial-free programming.
Support Icon
Learn about the many ways to support KCET.
Support Icon
Contact our Leadership, Advancement, Membership and Special Events teams.

New Battle Begins Over Redevelopment's End

It was always going to be ugly, given how we got here.

Governor Brown only meant to threaten cities with the dissolution of their redevelopment agencies. But when cities pushed back, the California Supreme Court - now it seems inevitable - upheld the vaguely written law that shuts down redevelopment and turns agency revenues over to the state for distribution to counties and school districts.

And now a new battle has begun. A coalition of cities - Pasadena, Palmdale, Glendale, Culver City, Huntington Beach, National City, Imperial Beach, Inglewood and Hayward - will try to persuade a Sacramento Superior Court judge Wednesday (05/30/12) to block the California Department of Finance (DOF) from determining what constitutes the "enforceable" debt that cities can claim their redevelopment agencies owe.

[Update 05/31/12: The cities lost this round, failing to convince a Sacramento Superior Court that the DOF should escrow disputed payments until all the issues are fully litigated. More suits are planned, however.]

So far, the DOF has rejected more than $350 million in agency debt. It's "nothing more than a naked money grab" say the cities that have joined the lawsuit, who also say that the DOF "is making up the rules as it goes along."

At issue is the property tax revenue cities say they need to pay back agency debt and finish redevelopment projects already underway. The law that eliminated redevelopment also lets cities retain some of property tax revenue their agency collected each year to pay existing debts. But the bigger the debt load cities claim, the smaller the cut of redevelopment property taxes the state and other taxing agencies will get.

The cities argue that their lists of debt obligations aren't inflated and that, in the end, they will have to drain already depleted budgets to pay those the DOF arbitrarily disallows. Cities also argue that the DOF, burdened with approving 425 separate payment schedules by early June, can't possibly be making informed choices about complex redevelopment deals.

Some in the Brown administration seem to agree. There is "no way in hell" the state will be able to effectively oversee the unwinding of redevelopment agencies, said one top DOF official earlier this year, before the cities sued.

According to the League of California Cities (which acts as a lobbyist for local governments), "The lawsuit seeks a court order that property taxes be distributed to pay for each valid enforceable obligation and further seeks a court order that each (county) auditor-controller set aside sufficient property tax to pay enforceable obligations that remain in dispute after June 1 until such disputes have been resolved."

The agency dissolution law gives the DOF a big hammer. If the DOF disputes the redevelopment obligations that cities say they must pay, the DOF will order county auditor-controllers to stop paying cities their share of property taxes. Cities with heavy debt loads fear that any delay in payments will erode their credit rating, boosting the costs of borrowing and threatening the state's overall creditworthiness.

Support Provided By
Support Provided By
Read More
A young girl with a red shirt plays with her parents

The U.S. Healthcare System is Broken, Middle-Class Families with Disabled Members Fight with the Power of Their Stories

For middle-class parents of disabled children, good income and great insurance are still not enough to cover the vast holes in U.S. healthcare.
un mazo de juez de madera

Justicia retrasada: tribunales abrumados por el atraso de la pandemia

Desde la manutención de los hijos hasta el fraude de seguros, los casos judiciales se retrasan en todo California. Solo la mitad de los casos civiles y penales se resolvieron el verano pasado en comparación con las cifras anteriores a la pandemia. “La justicia no se ha cerrado. La justicia se ha ralentizado”, según un grupo de abogados.
A gavel on a table

Justice Delayed: Courts Overwhelmed by Pandemic Backlog

From child support to insurance fraud, court cases are delayed throughout California. Only half as many civil and criminal cases were resolved last summer compared with pre-pandemic numbers. “Justice has not shut down. Justice has slowed down,” according to an attorneys’ group.