Skip to main content

Street Art: Benefit or Detriment?

Support Provided By
mural-censorship-los-angeles

Los Angeles' existing public art murals are falling into disrepair. The City so often referred to as the "mural capital of the world" may soon lose its title. While in the past the City did protect some older murals, it has allocated very few funds (if any) for the restoration of conservation of public murals. The City of Angels may have as many as 2,000 murals which are fading fast.

Starting in East Los Angeles, and eventually moving west, many of the City's most famous murals were painted decades ago, beginning in the 1960s. Some of these murals were commissioned later, for the 1984 Olympics. Many are now in tatters, either the victims of time, taggers, or both.

At a time when people are struggling to feed and care for themselves, should we be worried about whether the walls look pretty? Perhaps, if the money spent restoring our murals is less than the money reaped by a possible infusion of tourists and investments. Lets do a cost-benefit analysis and see tourists will go on mural tours as well as star tours.

And what about new murals? A Los Angeles law defines murals as signs and the City's 2002 Sign Ordinance has effectively prohibited most murals on private property.

This so-called moratorium on street murals is much maligned. One local graffiti artist, Saber, has protested the moratorium by taking to the skies. Literally. Saber hired five jet planes and painted the sky with messages like, "Art Is Not A Crime" and "End Mural Moratorium."

Prohibiting art, particularly on private property, is a dangerous business. While the City has an interest in ridding the city of violent or offensive graffiti, or even less than that - blight, our lawmakers must be careful not to outlaw murals because they do no like or agree with the message or the messenger.

More murals and street art commentary from KCET Departures:

The photo used on this post is by Flickr user GrahamKing. It was used under a Creative Commons License.

Support Provided By
Read More
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.