Skip to main content
Donate

Are San Bernardino Recall Efforts Worth the Time and Money?

By Jessica Levinson
June 17, 2013
Support Provided By
sanbernardinocityhall-thumb-600x423-53464
San Bernardino City Hall. | Photo: JimmyWayne/Flickr/Creative Commons License

There is a concerted effort underway to toss out the majority of the city of San Bernardino's elected officials. The recall is targeted at the mayor, the city attorney, and all seven members of the city council. This is significant if only for the sheer number of elected officials that recall proponents are seeking to toss out of office.

I discussed this issue during a live chat hosted by the Los Angeles News Group.

Proponents of the recall contend that San Bernardino's elected officials are responsible for driving the city into bankruptcy. Those opposed claim that the recall is actually about the desire of the proponents to sell the city's water system for their own benefit. Opponents are busy circulating an "anti-recall" petition. I will not weigh in here on the propriety of either argument.

Those pushing for the recall are undoubtedly taking an aggressive, partly symbolic stand. The mayor and three city council members are already up for re-election in November, when the recall election would be held. Further, the mayor has already stated that he will not run for another term.

Sometimes symbolism is important. It lets elected officials know that their constituents care. But on the other hand, this symbolism comes at a cost. Estimates are that the recall election will cost close to a quarter million dollars. That is real money, particularly for a city dealing with bankruptcy issues. A more cost efficient alternative might be to campaign against those up for election and target recall efforts only at those not up for election on the same day that the recall election would be held.

The recall is designed to allow voters to oust their elected officials before they would otherwise leave office. In this case, if some of the officials that are the target of the recall are voted out of office, they will only leave office a few months earlier than they would if they were defeated and served the remaining time in their terms, which end in March. Are those few months worth the expense?

Support Provided By
Read More
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
By Alejandro Lazo, CalMatters
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
By Alejandro Lazo, CalMatters
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.
By Emma Foehringer Merchant, Inside Climate News