Skip to main content

L.A. Pot Store Closures Can Continue, Court Says

Support Provided By
KCETmedpot25.jpg

An attempt to squash the current crackdown on post-moratorium pot storefronts in L.A. via the courts has failed, but many more lawsuits and court hearings lie ahead.

An attempt to get a temporary injunction against the city enforcing its June 7 deadline to shut down hundreds of pot storefronts that opened after the city declared a (now overturned by the courts) moratorium on them in November 2007 has failed. But the L.A. Weekly reports on many more legal challenges to come for the city:

Jane Usher, senior adviser to City Attorney Carmen Trutanich and the former head of the L.A. planning commission, told the Weekly that two additional pot-shop lawsuits against the city, on top of four existing ones, were rumored to be in the works.Still, Usher expressed confidence that the city would remain in a winning position in court. "There is at the moment to no judicial order restraining the city's enforcement come June 7," she said.

It matters very much in American justice the luck of what judge ends up hearing your case:

On Wednesday a judge indicated he might just give the plaintiffs their injunction. But when he said he was unable to preside over a subsequent hearing for a permanent injunction, the suit was transferred to Judge David P. Yaffee, who shut the door on the foursome of dispensaries.Attorneys for the shops had argued that the city's new law denied them due legal process -- there's virtually no pathway for legality under the new ordinance -- and equal protection under the law (because they weren't part of a 2007 group of shops grandfathered in by the city for possible legality).

The L.A. Times report has more specifics on other lawsuits the city faces challenging its crackdown:

The city also faces nine lawsuits filed this week by attorney Stewart Richlin, who intends to seek court orders to halt enforcement of the ordinance."I think that an intelligent judge looking at the facts objectively will agree that the city is applying a different standard to this process because of reefer madness," he said. Eric Shevin, another attorney, plans to file a lawsuit soon on behalf of medical marijuana patients and also pursue an order that would bar the city from enforcing the ordinance.

I wrote a cover story for the May issue of Reason magazine detailing the tangled history of Los Angeles's attempts to regulate medical marijuana storefronts.

The image associated with this post was taken by Flickr user Caveman92223. It was used under user Creative Commons license.

Support Provided By
Read More
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.