Finalists Announced in Pershing Square "Vision" Competition | KCET
Finalists Announced in Pershing Square "Vision" Competition
Remaking downtown Los Angeles has taken another long step. As LA history shows, it's one that might end badly.
In October, Pershing Square Renew - a city-chartered consortium of nonprofits, political heavyweights, and developers - posted the pitches of ten teams contending for PSR's commission to replace the much ridiculed 1993 version of Pershing Square (once called the city's Central Park, although no one does today).
On Monday, PSR named the four finalists from whom a design for making Pershing Square into something better will be chosen.
We're all invited to consider the vision - none anything like a plan yet - of each of the finalists. Meanwhile, they have three months to turn vision into a design. We'll see the results in an exhibition in March 2016, when additional public comment will be solicited. Our preferences, PSR has said, will be a factor in selecting the winning plan in April.
The interests that have a stake in downtown's renewal will celebrate the selection of a winner. But as Los Angeles Times architecture critic Christopher Hawthorne warned in a recent tweet, the ballyhoo has end in actual construction. "Who is going to pay for the new Pershing Square?" he pointedly asked.
Until that's decided, the visions are less design schemes and more like poetry - the poetry of place.
Los Angeles, more than any other American city, has a troubled history with that kind of poetry. So much of Los Angeles came into being solely because it was so beautifully sold, in every medium of advertising, beginning at the turn of the 20th century. The triumph of marketing made Los Angeles what it is today. Perhaps we should have become more hardened ... or at least asked harder questions of the boosters.
And some of us are still suckers for the urgent promise that someone else's idea of tomorrow's city will resolve our anxieties about the city we have today.
To help distinguish the finalists for one another, PSR has given them team names. From the PSR announcement, they are:
At this early stage, their sketchy concepts necessarily have a common look. In line with the competition's guidelines, they all aim to make Pershing Square accessible, fully connected to the surrounding urban fabric, and green, along with providing space for community programs and celebratory events. Trees, grass, shade structures, and walkways are in every proposal in different combinations and emphases.
The concepts also use a common vocabulary to describe a better Los Angeles. It should have a "heart" (even, as more than one proposal put it, "a beating heart") re-centered at Pershing Square. As the symbolic center of Los Angeles, Pershing Square should reflect the "very essence" of the city. The city's essence in the proposals is (predictably) diverse, and because it is, the language about Pershing Square is (predictably) diffuse. It's also disturbingly ahistorical For most of its history, Pershing Square was the anti-heart of mestizo Los Angeles that refused to beat with a Latin rhythm.
A new Pershing Square, according to the four finalists, should be timeless and dynamic, a stage for big ideas and intimate, an urban oasis of nature and the site of income-producing commercial development, visionary and grassroots, comfortable and visceral, cohesive and democratic - as well as exciting, honest, seamless, transparent, and eventful.
That's a lot to ask of the city block bounded by Olive, Hill, 5th, and 6th streets.
Recognizing the limits of Pershing Square, some of the proposals call for converting one or more of the bordering streets into a pedestrian concourse. Other proposals, with less detail, imagine park events and programs extending onto the sidewalks and into the ground floors of the buildings that face Pershing Square. Given the politics of development in Los Angeles, either concept would make it harder to realize the final plan.
Perhaps all these expectations are too much for Pershing Square to carry; perhaps all of Los Angeles - heart, essence, or center - can't be fitted into this modest space without another round of disappointment, regret, and rejection.
From 1870 until 1954 - even until 1993 - Pershing Square was mostly a place for strolling and sitting, a place that expressed the essence of Los Angeles as a place in the sun, a place of refreshment and ease. The experience of the park then was theatrical and direct in fundamental ways - as a place to see and be seen in public, to display who we are as Angeleños (even with our rough edges and less-than-perfect desires).
The poetry that the finalists composed to pitch their vision for Pershing Square reads a bit like the description of an urban theme park, relentlessly cheerful. Encouragingly, PSR has reminded the finalists to frame their final designs with less architecture and more park, where enjoyment would come with a different rhythm and moods more various.
PSR's own vision for Pershing Square is deliberately undefined, but it does contain a tragic assumption about the nature of place in Los Angeles. We bought the idea that it was possible to render the bewildering complexity of the region - its divided heart as much as its mixed character - in a single, material symbol. The symbol was, for more than a century, a "villa in its garden" - a house and a yard and a lawn where all of nature and all of civilization combined in (segregated) harmony.
In acquiring a house here, the extravagant sales pitch went, you gained all of what we thought Los Angeles means.
The crowd of adjectives in the proposals for Pershing Square has the same singular ambition, even though the meaning of Los Angeles - in its history and its character - continues to elude us, as the repeated remakings of Pershing Square, in response to the demands of our unfulfilled desire, continue to show.
The economic, social, and environmental woes of Trona are common to communities built around extractive industries. But even after the 2019 earthquake, the residents of the mining town remain "Trona Strong."
“New Shores: The Future Dialogue Between Two Homelands,” is a Current:LA event series highlighting the cuisine of nearby neighborhoods and the immigrant stories that thread them together.
Since its gifting to Los Angeles on December 1896, Griffith Park has been the sprawling landscape on which Angelenos have drawn their dreams. Learn more about its many unexpected histories.
How well do you know what goes in the blue bin and what goes in the trash? Take our recycling quiz to test your knowledge.
- 1 of 210
- next ›