Skip to main content

New Pollution Rule for Heavy-Duty Trucks Is First in U.S. in 20 Years

An Amazon and a FedEx truck pass through a residential neighborhood at dusk, with a basketball hoop in the foreground
JURUPA VALLEY, CA - APRIL 30, 2021: Amazon and FedEx big rig trucks pass by a neighborhood in route to warehouses nearby off Etiwanda Avenue on April 30, 2021 in Jurupa Valley, California. The increases amount of warehouses in the Inland Empire has also increased the diesel truck traffic causing more air pollution in the Southland. | Gina Ferazzi/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
Support Provided By

This story was originally published by Grist. You can subscribe to its weekly newsletter here.

Communities that have long borne the brunt of vehicle pollution are one step closer to breathing cleaner air after the Environmental Protection Agency finalized stricter emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles last Tuesday.

The agency’s new rule, part of its larger Clean Trucks Plan, is the first time pollution standards for semi trucks, delivery trucks and buses have been updated in more than 20 years. It will go into effect when 2027 vehicle models are made available for purchase.

This rule should make a tremendous amount of difference.
Melody Reis, Senior Legislative Manager, Moms Clean Air Force

Although heavy-duty vehicles represent less than 5% of vehicles on the nation's roads, they are major emitters of nitrogen oxides, a group of polluting gases that play a significant role in the formation of smog. In high concentrations, nitrogen oxides are known to contribute to heart disease, allergies, asthma and other lung diseases.

The EPA's rule will for the first time require manufacturers to adopt newer technology that reduces pollution from trucks when they are idle, driving at low speeds or navigating stop-and-go traffic. By 2045, the agency estimates that heavy-duty vehicle nitrogen dioxide emissions will decrease by 48% as a result of the rule. The regulation is also expected to prevent up to 2,900 deaths by 2045.

Low-income people of color are more likely to live and work in neighborhoods close to major highways and roads, shipping corridors and areas with large numbers of factories and warehouses — places where heavy-duty trucks create the most pollution. That's because of the legacy of racist redlining and zoning laws that left many Black and brown families with few other housing options. The construction of the nation's interstate highway system also targeted neighborhoods where communities of color were concentrated. And in some cities, bans on trucks on certain highways simply pushed them into already-burdened neighborhoods.

These communities have waited decades for action.
Katherine García, Sierra Club

"These communities have waited decades for action," Katherine García, the director of the Sierra Club's clean transportation campaign, told Grist.

But in recent years, in spite of overall stricter emissions standards for personal vehicles, communities that have fought for years for cleaner, more breathable air have faced setbacks. The rise in global e-commerce — exemplified by online giants like Amazon — has led to an explosion in warehouses, and their attendant delivery trucks, across the country. These "logistics hubs," designed to accommodate constant consumer demand, frequently end up in areas with loose zoning regulations, cheap land and a high proportion of low-income people of color living nearby.

The logistics industry is the primary contributor to air pollution in the Inland Empire.
How Supply Chains Affect Air Quality in the Inland Empire

California's Inland Empire, east of Los Angeles, is the home to the nation’s largest concentration of warehouses. The region is also infamous for having the nation's worst ozone and particle pollution. Residents and advocates here have drawn a link between consumer demand for goods and the hundreds, if not thousands, of trucks that travel their roads on a daily basis. These trucks end up driving past and idling by schools, parks and homes, exposing residents to more air pollution. Earlier this year, a cohort of the region's cities extended moratoriums on warehouse construction to take time to assess the purported economic benefits and the very real environmental impacts of these developments.

"We need systemic change, and we need to just clean up these trucks, and we have the solutions," Melody Reis, the senior legislative manager at Moms Clean Air Force, a national organization that advocates for cleaner air, told Grist.

"Inaction is injustice for these communities," said Reis, "and this rule should make a tremendous amount of difference."

Support Provided By
Read More
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.