Skip to main content

Skyscrapers and Billboards Most Lobbied Issues in L.A.

Support Provided By
billboardlexus-600

Photo by tantekFlickr/Creative Commons License

Hollywood skyscrapers, billboard advertising laws, and developments by entertainment companies were among the most-lobbied issues at Los Angeles City Hall during the first three months of the year.

According to a report by the Ethics Commission, New York-based developer Millennium Partners and Millennium Partners LA shelled out $480,460 to promote its proposed 4.47-acre skyscraper project in Hollywood, the most spent by any outside company during the year's first quarter. The project would bring 700 condos and luxury hotel rooms to the neighborhood.

Meanwihle, NBCUniversal paid two lobbying firms a total of $331,648 for community
outreach of its $1.6 billion Evolution Plan, which includes upgrades to the company's film production facilities and new office space. The city council approved a development agreement with NBCUniversal in February.

Billboard company CBS Outdoor paid $205,513 to lobbyists to advocate for their interests in outdoor advertising regulation and competitor Clear Channel Outdoor, paid at least $121,451 on lobbyists at City Hall. Both companies were ordered by a Superior Court judge in April to turn off nearly 100 digital billboards that were part of an invalidated 2009 settlement agreement with the city.

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa met with a handful of billboard companies, including CBS and Clear Channel, in a closed door meeting last month, the Daily News reported today. But one company, Summit Media was reportedly not invited to the meeting.

Summit, which spent $85,108 in lobbying, brought a lawsuit against the city for only allowing CBS and Clear Channel to convert standard billboards into digital ones. Their case prevailed, prompting a judge to order around 100 signs to go dark earlier this year.

In all, outside groups spent a total of $9.6 million on lobbyist services from January through March. Other top spenders -- developers seeking approval for their projects -- included Tower Lane Properties Inc., Champion Real Estate Co., Target Corp., JMB Realty Corp., and McCormack Baron Salazar.

Lobbyists also raised $189,923 for city elected officials and candidates running for mayor, controller, attorney, and council seats in the March 5 and May 21 city elections, according to the report. Lobbying firms also served as conduits for $50,134 in political contributions.

Support Provided By
Read More
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.