Skip to main content
Donate

BrightSource, Inyo County Reach Agreement on Hidden HIlls

By Chris Clarke
March 18, 2013
Support Provided By
hidden-hills-3-18-13-thumb-600x450-47335
In the neighborhood of the Hidden Hills project | Photo: Ken Lund/Flickr/Creative Commons License

 

After several months' worth of wrangling over the potential costs to the county of Inyo from BrightSource's proposed HIdden Hills solar project near Tecopa, the company and the county have reached an agreement. Under the terms of the settlement, BrightSource will pay Inyo County $15 million over the first 18 months of the project's operation.

The project, which would occupy about 3,277 acres of private land in the Pahrump Valley just inside the California state line, had been criticized by the county for increasing its infrastructural and service burden, requiring additional law enforcement and firefighting services in the remote Charleston Heights area.

Under the terms of the agreement, announced last week, BrightSource would pony up $2.5 million by the beginning of construction, paying the remaining $12.5 million within the first 18 months of the plant's operation. BrightSource will be able to credit some tax obligations it may owe the county toward the full amount.

The agreement also includes some provisions relating to decommissioning, use of overweight trucks on county roads, and Inyo County's claims on certain roads on-site.

With the agreement, Inyo County agrees not to oppose the project before the California Energy Commission, currently conducting hearings on the project in Sacramento. That's one less opponent for BrightSource, which hopes to start construction on the plant this year. But will one less project opponent make a difference? ReWire will have more on the Hidden Hills hearings as the week progresses.

Support Provided By
Read More
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
By Alejandro Lazo, CalMatters
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
By Alejandro Lazo, CalMatters
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.
By Emma Foehringer Merchant, Inside Climate News