Muhammad Ali

Muhammad Ali

Start watching
SoCal Update

SoCal Update

Start watching
a large damn with graffiti of a woman with a hammer on it, mountains in the background

Earth Focus Presents

Start watching
Southland Sessions

Southland Sessions

Start watching
Professor T

Professor T (Belgium)

Start watching
Artbound

Artbound

Start watching
Emma

Emma

Start watching
Guilt

Guilt

Start watching
Line of Separation Key Art.

Line of Separation

Start watching
Us

Us

Start watching
The Latino Experience

The Latino Experience

Start watching
Key Art of "Summer of Rockets" featuring Keeley Hawes and Toby Stephens.

Summer of Rockets

Start watching
Death in Paradise Series 10

Death in Paradise

Start watching
millionaire still

KCET Must See Movies

Start watching
Independent Lens

Independent Lens

Start watching
MJ250sC-show-poster2x3-Bflky7i.png

Tending Nature

Start watching
Earth Focus

Earth Focus

Start watching
City Rising

City Rising

Start watching
Lost LA

Lost LA

Start watching
Member
Your donation supports our high-quality, inspiring and commercial-free programming.
Support Icon
Learn about the many ways to support KCET.
Support Icon
Contact our Leadership, Advancement, Membership and Special Events teams.

Feds Deny Solar Project Near Mojave National Preserve

Support Provided By
silurian-valley-11-24-14-thumb-630x376-84376
The Silurian Valley | Photo: Chris Clarke

A controversial large solar project that would have occupied more than 1,600 acres along the main scenic route between two desert national parks won't be happening, it was announced Friday. The 200-megawatt Silurian Valley solar project, which had been proposed by Iberdrola Renewables, was rejected by the Bureau of Land Management, which said the project would cause too much damage to the area's environment and historic resources.

Iberdrola's project would have been built along Highway 127 about ten miles north of the community of Baker in San Bernardino County, along a stretch of road that has been described as one of the most scenic in the state (including here at KCET.) The solar project would also have been immediately adjacent to Iberdrola's proposed Silurian Valley wind project, a 160-megawatt facility occupying more than 6,700 acres in the north end of the valley.

According to a press release issued by the BLM, the agency's assessment of the project found that its "impacts to the Silurian Valley, a largely undisturbed valley that supports wildlife, an important piece of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail, and recreational and scenic values, had too great of an impact on the resources." The BLM determined that the solar project would not be in the public interest. The wind component of the project was not addressed in the announcement.

The Silurian Valley solar project had been intensely controversial due to its location in a renowned scenic corridor between Death Valley National Park and the Mojave National Preserve, as well as the likelihood that migratory birds following the course of the Mojave River drainage a few miles south might mistake the project's photovoltaic panels for a large lake adjacent to the Silver Lake playa.

This is the first time the BLM has turned down a renewable energy project on so-called "variance lands" that lie outside Solar Energy Zones designated by the U.S. Department of the Interior in 2012. Had the BLM approved Silurian Valley solar, the project would have been able to begin the environmental impact assessment process under the National Environmental Policy Act.

Unsurprisingly, environmental groups that had opposed the Silurian Valley solar project lauded the decision by the BLM.

"This isn't about solar or wind energy," said Sally Miller, a senior California conservation representative for thew Wilderness Society. "It is about the value of this place. Silurian Valley is simply not suitable for this type of large scale development. By denying the variance application, the BLM has paved the way for the level of protection this desert treasure has long deserved."

"Silurian Valley is the "connective tissue" of this portion of the northern Mojave Desert," added Miller. "It encompasses lower elevation lands that provide important connectivity habitat between nearby mountain ranges, and that link Death Valley National Park with the Mojave National Preserve. Allowing this application to move forward could have attracted more transmission, roads and other development, and potentially spurred other applications and potential development in this very special and remote part of the California desert."

"Today's decision is a powerful step forward for the BLM and its stated landscape-level approach to conservation and guided energy development," said David Lamfrom, California Desert Associate Director of the National Parks Conservation Association. "It also marks tremendous progress for wildlife and one of our truly wild and beautiful places."

Support Provided By
Read More
Three people stand looking at the destroyed landscape after a mudflow, one woman has her hands on her head

What Happens After a Mudflow Destroys Your Home? The Hidden Costs of Rebuilding Post-Fire

Even after a wildfire is fully suppressed, the danger may not be over. Fires increase the likelihood of devastating mudflows after a rain. And unforeseen costs place financial burdens on those looking to rebuild.
Operations Section Chief Jon Wallace wearing a yellow jacket looks at and reached out to touch the protective foil wrapping around a big sequoia tree called General Sherman at Sequoia National Park, California

California Moves on Climate Change, but Rejects Aggressive Cuts to Greenhouse Emissions

Drought, wildfires, extreme heat: California lawmakers cast climate change as the culprit in an emerging series of public health threats, setting aside billions to help communities respond. But they stopped short of more aggressively reducing the state’s share of the greenhouse emissions warming the planet.
A wide shot of families walking along the concrete banks of the LA river with a bridge in the background

Near, Far, Wherever They Are, Angelenos Love the L.A. River

In a new, multilingual poll, 91% of L.A. residents supported river revitalization, while only 48% of those would support a tax increase to do it. Meanwhile, 76% of respondents prioritized ensuring that revitalization projects don’t displace locals.