Skip to main content

Ivory Ban Bill Advances in Sacramento

Support Provided By
ivory-ban-bill-3-11-15-thumb-630x421-89319
Elephants in Chobe National Park, Botswana | Photo: Paolo/Flickr/Creative Commons License

A bill that would ban sale of almost all products containing ivory and rhino horn in California has passed a major hurdle in the Assembly. AB 96, which would close a loophole in state law that currently allows sale of ivory and rhino horn imported before 1977, passed the Assembly's Committee on Water, Parks, and Wildlife by a 10-2 vote Tuesday.

AB 96, which was introduced by Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins of San Diego in January, would make it much easier to enforce existing laws banning the sale of ivory imported into the state after the 1970s. Ivory dealers often distress their products to make them appear older, and than makes it difficult for California Department of Fish and Wildlife law enforcement officers to assess whether a particular stock of ivory is legal for sale.

In 2014, the Natural Resources Defense Council surveyed ivory offered for sale by more than 100 California vendors, and found that between 77 and 90 percent of the ivory they saw was likely illegal under existing state law.

Federal law covering the sale, possession, or importation of elephant ivory is bewilderingly complex, with different categories of ivory depending on the object's age. As a result of the complexity of both state and federal law, reported the NRDC, vendors they contacted were often confused about which ivory objects were legal to sell in the state.

A complete ban on ivory trinkets would certainly simplify that confusion. AB 96 would exempt ivory detailing in musical instruments, such as piano keys or guitar fretwork, as long as the owner can verify the instrument was built before 1976. A few scientific pursuits involving ivory would also be exempted.

The bill would also give explicit responsibility for enforcing the ban on ivory to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Existing law isn't clear on that responsibility, which has led to spotty enforcement due to confusion over which police agency is responsible for cracking down on violators.

The thriving trade in ivory is responsible for the deaths of an estimated 30,000 or more elephants a year, and ivory poaching is thought to be the main reason the population of African forest elephants has dropped by more than 60 percent since 2002.

And that trade is nothing if not lucrative. "Illicit wildlife trafficking is estimated to be a $20 billion industry, right behind narcotics and weapons smuggling, with ivory trafficking alone accounting for $10 billion of that illegal trade," said Jennifer Molidor of the Animal Legal Defense Fund.

Those illicit industries are increasingly linked, as paramilitary groups and terrorist organizations operating in elephant habitat have increasingly turned to ivory poaching as a fundraising tool. That includes groups as well known as Joseph Kony's illegal army in Uganda and the Janjaweed militia in Sudan.

"In addition to the concern for rapidly dwindling populations of the earth's largest land mammal, this nexus of lucrative ivory trafficking, terrorism, and other human rights violations provides yet another compelling reason to eliminate the market for ivory," said Molidor.

California is a major hub for American ivory sales, with Los Angeles and San Francisco second and third only to New York City in terms of items sold annually. A total ban on ivory sales with clear enforcement responsibility could drastically reduce the amount of ivory sold in the U.S.

"The only way to ensure that poachers stop hacking the faces off of elephants and rhinos for their ivory and horns is to ban the sale and trade in the parts of these animals," added ALDF legislative counsel Carney Anne Nasser. "No trinket is worth the life of a critically threatened species."

The bill now goes to the Assembly's Appropriations Committee.

Support Provided By
Read More
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.
A Black woman with long, black brains wears a black Chicago Bulls windbreaker jacket with red and white stripes as she stands at the top of a short staircase in a housing complex and rests her left hand on the metal railing. She smiles slightly while looking directly at the camera.

Los Angeles County Is Testing AI's Ability To Prevent Homelessness

In order to prevent people from becoming homeless before it happens, Los Angeles County officials are using artificial intelligence (AI) technology to predict who in the county is most likely to lose their housing. They would then step in to help those people with their rent, utility bills, car payments and more so they don't become unhoused.