Skip to main content

Senate Confirms New Head of EPA

Support Provided By
gina-mccarthy-EPA-7-19-17-thumb-600x407-55837
Gina McCarthy, incoming Environmental Protection Agency administrator | Photo: EPA

Ending a long stalemate, the U.S. Senate voted 59-40 today to confirm Regina "Gina" McCarthy as administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. McCarthy was nominated in March. The long-delayed confirmation had been a bargaining chip in a partisan battle over the Obama administration's energy policy.

Among other positions, McCarthy was previously the EPA's Assistant Administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation.

The five months between McCarthy's nomination and this week's confirmation marks the longest time the EPA has gone without an official administrator. Former Administrator Lisa Jackson stepped down in January. In the interim, the agency had been managed by Bob Perciasepe, the EPA's Deputy Administrator.

Republicans in the Senate had been holding up McCarthy's confirmation essentially as a result of actions by Senators Roy Blunt of Missouri and David Vitter of Louisiana, who objected to EPA's insistence on habitat protection in a Mississippi river levee project. Vitter, who's the ranking Republican on the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee, told press on various occasions that he was waiting on the confirmation until McCarthy answered a full set of questions posed by his committee in some detail about how she'd manage the EPA. There were 1,100 questions on the list, all but 25 of them from the Committee's Republican members. Vitter is credited with writing at least 600 of those questions.

The Republican stall was not much more than a symbolic annoyance, given that Perciasepe is eminently qualified to run the EPA in his own right. In fact, McCarthy may well be easier for Republican Senators to work with than the liberal Democrat Perciasepe, given her tenure as Mitt Romney's environmental advisor when Romney was Governor of Massachusetts.

Now that she's got the keys to the office, McCarthy will be in charge of implementing Obama administration plans for the EPA to begin regulating carbon emissions from power plants and other sources, as well as guiding the administration to a final decision on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline. In other words, McCarthy's tenure will shape White House climate change policy.

She's got the backing of large environmental groups in that regard, with groups like EDF lauding McCarthy for her history of what they called "common-sense environmentalism" and bipartisanship.

Support Provided By
Read More
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.