Skip to main content

Solar Group: 'Don't Trust Utilities On Rooftop Solar Costs'

Support Provided By
sun-flower-12-18-12-thumb-600x450-42275

Photo: Lubaib Gazir/Flickr/Creative Commons License

ReWire reported Monday on utility complaints that rooftop solar customers are costing other ratepayers money. Now, a leading California solar advocacy group has weighed in in no uncertain terms, calling utility allegations that rooftop solar panel owners cost other ratepayers money "largely horsemalarkey."


Related

feed-in-tariffs-net-metering

What Are? PACE Loans, Feed In Tariffs and Net Metering

The San Francisco-based advocacy group Vote Solar has posted a blistering rebuttal to the Bloomberg article ReWire noted Monday, accusing California's largest investor-owned utilities of "rushing to derail one of our most important solar programs, and... doing it with some mighty fuzzy math."Vote Solar's post, which doesn't bear a byline, alleges that utilities seem to have "cooked the books" to come up with the total of $1.3 billion that non-solar ratepayers are theoretically paying to cover the costs of solar. Most seriously, Vote Solar charges that utilities' assessment of the amount of solar entering the grid is inflated by somewhere between 50 and 80 percent:

Utilities count all solar energy generated by the net metered customer as a cost that someone else has to pay for...but 50 to 80 percent of that power is used on-site without ever touching the utility's grid. Just like energy efficiency, solar power that's used on-site places no burden on the utility system, and yet utilities are accounting for it as if it's a cost. This is exactly like saying that when a customer turns off her lights, she should have to pay for the power she doesn't use. [Emphasis in original.]

The post also points out that net metering solar customers are usually paid based on a cheaper, lower-tier cost per kilowatt-hour, while utilities report those costs as if they were paid at a higher-tier rate, inflating those costs by another 18 to 40 percent. And the Vote Solar adds that -- as ReWire noted Monday -- the allegations of transferred costs don't account for the benefits from avoiding centralized generation and new transmission lines.

The Bloomberg article didn't cite utility sources for their calculations. Vote Solar points out that its analysis of the utilities' position is based on previous similar statements.

ReWire is dedicated to covering renewable energy in California. Keep in touch by liking us on Facebook, and help shape our editorial direction by taking this quick survey here.

Support Provided By
Read More
A blonde woman wearing a light grey skirt suit stands with her back to the camera as she holds a sheet of paper and addresses a panel at the front of a courtroom

California Passed a Law To Stop 'Pay to Play' in Local Politics. After Two Years, Legislators Want to Gut It

California legislators who backed a 2022 law limiting businesses' and contractors' attempts to sway local elected officials with campaign contributions are now trying to water it down — with the support of developers and labor unions.
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.