Member
Your donation supports our high-quality, inspiring and commercial-free programming.
Support Icon
Discover all the ways you can make a difference.
Support Icon
The Leadership, Advancement, Membership and Special Events teams are here to help.

Trashing Old Solar Panels is a More Complicated Process Than You Think

Support Provided By
broken-sola-10-17-13-thumb-600x359-62082
Broken solar panel | Photo: pv411/Flickr/Creative Commons License

A state administrative agency has rejected a bid by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to exempt discarded solar cells from some hazardous waste regulations.

Earlier this month, the state's Office of Administrative Law (OAL), which oversees administrative rulemaking, said that it could not approve DTSC's proposal to treat used solar panels as so-called "universal wastes," a hazardous waste category that includes a number of common products such as batteries and household pesticides.

The OAL said that DTSC's proposal would conflict with federal and state hazardous waste handling regulations, in part because of the diverse kinds of solar cells the proposed regulation would cover.

Photovoltaic cells differ widely in the toxicity of their components, from essentially non-toxic crystalline silicon (though other substances used in silicon PV cells can be of concern) to thin-film cells that contain elements such as cadmium, lead, or selenium.

The DTSC had hoped to make handling restrictions for discarded solar panels less stringent, so that hazardous waste companies could do things like remove wiring and other electronic components from the panels for recycling or salvage.

Hazardous waste regulation is complex, and venturing into the regulation books can easily make your eyes glaze over. But the root of the OAL's rejection of the DTSC proposal lies in the difference between two main legal classes of hazardous waste under the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and California law.

RCRA lists a number of specific hazardous materials that must be disposed of according to its regulations. It also describes classes of hazardous materials according to properties such as reactivity (will it create toxic fumes or explode?), corrosivity, flammability, and toxicity.

RCRA's list of regulated substances is extensive, including any substance created in a long list of industrial processes. But some states have more extensive lists. California state law recognizes a whole separate class of toxic substances that aren't covered by RCRA in that they're not corrosive, ignitable, reactive, or toxic by RCRA standards. The state refers to these hazardous wastes as non-RCRA wastes.

Given that some solar panels contain toxic ingredients such as cadmium, copper, selenium, and lead, they become RCRA wastes when it's time to dispose of them. The DTSC's proposed regulation would have reclassified both RCRA and non-RCRA panels into a new solar panel category of universal waste with less stringent regulation.

Problem is, the standards for handling universal waste in California are less stringent than RCRA's standards. California law says handling wastes covered by RCRA must be subject to state regulations that are at least as stringent as RCRA's requirements. This new rule would have regulated RCRA solar panels less stringently, so the OAL said no.

There were other flaws in the proposed regulation. The DTSC's rule didn't require any kind of recycling of solar panel materials. Nor did it address the effects of having millions of aging solar panels potentially leaking heavy metals into the environment, either in urban settings or in wildlife habitat.

The OAL has invited DTSC to rewrite the rule and resubmit it for consideration. In the meantime, the agency's action is a timely reminder that no technology is without its downside. In order for solar power to be truly clean, we need to make sure to handle solar panels safely when they reach the end of their usable lives.

Support Provided By
Read More
Bayard Rustin beside a sign that says "Integration means better schools for all."

How Gandhi's Peaceful Protest Principles Made Its Way to the U.S.

Inspired by Gandhi, Bayard Rustin transforms the civil rights movement and mobilizes support to welcome Southeast Asian refugees.
Two black and white photos, one of Yuri Kochiyama on the left and one of Malcolm X on the right, are collaged side-by-side. Yuri Kochiyama is at a microphone, looking down past her angled eye glasses and reading off a crumbled paper. Malcolm X is seen smiling at the camera, wearing a suit and tie.

Malcolm X and Yuri Kochiyama's Barrier-Breaking Friendship

Two icons of American history, Yuri Kochiyama and Malcolm X, share a birthday — May 19 — and a passion to change the world.
Black and white portraits of Wong Kim Ark, left, and Fredrick Douglass, right, arranged side by side.

How Frederick Douglass and Wong Kim Ark Helped Define Who Can Be American

Abolitionist Frederick Douglass and a restaurant worker named Wong Kim Ark fight for immigrants and the right to become American citizens.