What Climate Change Will Mean for the California Desert | KCET
What Climate Change Will Mean for the California Desert
The World Bank report, Turn Down The Heat: Why a 4 degree centrigrade warmer world must be avoided, prepared by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Climate Analytics, states that while we could still limit global average temperature increase to 2°C, current policies and emissions targets will likely result in at least a 3-4° increase by the end of the century. From the report:
A 4° increase is approximately the same degree of difference as between our pre-industrial climate and the height of the last Ice Age, but while temperatures warmed from Ice Age levels over a period of thousands of years, this rise will come within a human lifetime, giving the planet's ecosystems precious little time to adapt.
That's a 4° average increase. Some parts of the world will see greater increases than that. The report projects increases of as much as 6°C -- almost 11° Fahrenheit -- in the Mediterranean, North Africa, the Middle East, and the contiguous United States. We saw a foreshadowing of that future this past summer, as temperatures in the Plains states rose to as much as 12°C higher than usual in the third week in June.
Though the correlation isn't exact, increased temperatures are often accompanies by increased aridity, and this past summer provides yet another example in North America. Throughout the summer months, a record drought took hold over the majority of the Western and midwestern United States, in some regions to a degree unparalleled since the 1880s.
As you can see, though the worst of the drought centered on places well to the east of California, the California desert suffered severe, long-term drought this past summer -- with neighboring desert areas in northern Nevada tipping over into extreme drought conditions.
Long-term drought is of special concern for ecological modeling: while a short-term drought may cause serious damage to agriculture and some annual wild plants, a longer drought means die-off of desert trees, mature shrubs, and other organisms that have the reserves to weather a short period of aridity. That's part of what ecologists refer to when they talk about things like the eventual die-off of Joshua trees from within Joshua Tree National Park: drought causes stress not only on the trees, but also on animals in the vicinity that may turn to eating the trees' vascular tissue in order to get a little water, killing the trees. Many desert organisms can withstand higher temperatures than they usually see so long as they have sufficient water. Raise the temperatures and impose a drought and organisms from junipers to jackrabbits will suffer.
Drought also means less runoff in the Colorado River basin, in turn meaning less water in the river. The Colorado is already oversubscribed -- there are more claims on the water than there is water. Drying up the river even more means some current water users will have to go without. In all likelihood, that means less water going to agriculture, and irrigated desert farms across the Southwest going fallow. Without either healthy crops or native vegetation to hold the soil in place, that soil is going to go airborne every time the wind picks up -- and a warmer world means more frequent and more powerful storms. The haboobs that have swept out of Arizona and into California over the last couple of years will very likely become a far more frequent occurrence.
As for overall environmental impacts, the World Bank report projects serious disruption to biodiversity even at a 2.5°C increase, with a 4° increase nearly inevitably bringing about sharp ecosystem disruptions:
How will such a temperature increase affect desert people? Summers in the low desert already reach temperatures that would prove fatal to vulnerable people in the absence of air conditioning. Average high temperatures in Palm Springs, Indio and Mecca brush up against the 110°F mark, which means that it's hotter than that as much as half the time. Increases in temperature in the 4°C range (7.2°F) would push the Coachella and Imperial valleys' climate into the range currently enjoyed by Furnace Creek in Death Valley. A wide swath of California from Desert Hot Springs to Calexico would become essentially uninhabitable for people without sufficient wealth to pay high electric bills. So would Phoenix, with Tucson and Las Vegas not far behind. Barstow, the Morongo Basin, and the Antelope Valley would experience a climate similar to that of present-day Coachella.
That's not just going to make us feel somewhat uncomfortable on the walk between the air conditioned car and the air conditioned shopping mall. There are huge public health impacts of a warming world, many of which will be keenly felt by the desert's most vulnerable people. The 2003 heat wave in Europe pushed temperatures to 103°F or so, a range experienced by the Coachella Valley every summer, but as few people had access to air conditioning, 50,000 people are estimated to have died from heat exposure. Imagine if those temperatures had been ten or fifteen degrees higher. We can expect more and more heat waves that claim lives among the desert's homeless, indigent or disabled populations, especially if power blackouts increase. Higher temperatures will mean worse public health impacts from air pollution, including not just drought-aggravated particulate matter but smog-forming chemicals, whose toxicity will be heightened the hotter the temperature at which they're cooked.
That's just a quick overview of what the California desert faces if we don't get our greenhouse gas emissions under control.
Chris Clarke is an environmental writer of two decades standing. Director of Desert Biodiversity, he writes from Joshua Tree regularly at his acclaimed blog Coyote Crossing and comments on desert issues on KCET weekly. Read his recent posts here.
For ongoing environmental coverage in March 2017 and afterward, please visit our show Earth Focus, or browse Redefine for historic material.
KCET's award-winning environment news project Redefine ran from July 2012 through February 2017.
The economic, social, and environmental woes of Trona are common to communities built around extractive industries. But even after the 2019 earthquake, the residents of the mining town remain "Trona Strong."
“New Shores: The Future Dialogue Between Two Homelands,” is a Current:LA event series highlighting the cuisine of nearby neighborhoods and the immigrant stories that thread them together.
Since its gifting to Los Angeles on December 1896, Griffith Park has been the sprawling landscape on which Angelenos have drawn their dreams. Learn more about its many unexpected histories.
How well do you know what goes in the blue bin and what goes in the trash? Take our recycling quiz to test your knowledge.
- 1 of 210
- next ›