Skip to main content

Feds Okay $1-Billion Los Angeles River Project

Support Provided By
marshpark-fed-approval
socal-connected-story-connect

A segment based on this story was produced for KCET's award-winning TV show "SoCal Connected." Watch it here now.

The jury is in and the Los Angeles River's future seems to be bright. After more than six months of intense lobbying by the city, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) has announced that it will be recommending a more ambitious $1-billion plan to restore an 11-mile stretch of the Los Angeles River from downtown through Griffith Park.

"I was tenacious about this -- it's a big win for the city," Mayor Eric Garcetti said over at the Los Angeles Times. "As I argued in the White House over and over, it's the right thing for the ecology, it's the right thing for the economy and for kids growing up being separated from downtown by a concrete flood control channel."

Alternative 20 or the RIVER Alternative (short for Riparian Integration via Varied Ecological Introduction) is the most comprehensive of all options outlined in the $9.71-million study of the Los Angeles River initiated in 2006 at the behest of the U.S. Congress. Aside from increasing habitat by 119 percent, it incorporates all of the elements of previous alternatives along with the restoration of the Verdugo Wash and the wetlands of the Los Angeles State Historic Park. [Read up on the other alternatives here].

Before and After: Pollywog Park area of Griffith Park
Before and After: Pollywog Park area of Griffith Park
Before and After: Arroyo Seco Confluence in Cypress Park
Before and After: Arroyo Seco Confluence in Cypress Park

Though Alternative 20 provides for the most improvement along the concretized river, the Army Corps originally recommended Alternative 13, a $453-million project that would only increase habitat by 104 percent, add a side channel behind Ferraro Fields, widen Taylor Yard by 300 feet, and restore a tributary on the east side of the Arroyo Seco watershed. "Alternative 13 maximizes the net benefits: ecosystem and habitat restoration relative to the cost," said Army Corps spokesperson Jay Field previously.

It seems the city's single-minded focus and overwhelming support from various sectors for the more ambitious alternative has managed to change a few key minds in Washington.
According to the LA Times, the cost for the proposal will be split evenly between the federal government and city and state. "The bulk of the federal money would come from the Army Corps, with the Department of the Interior and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency "looking to aggressively bring money to the table as well," Garcetti said. "The rest of the money will come from local and state sources."

The Los Angeles River Revitalization Corp. estimates that enhancing the 11-mile stretch of the river could kickstart as much as $5 billion in investment all along the 51-mile river over the next 10 to 15 years and generate up to 18,000 jobs.

Before and After: Verdugo Wash east of Griffith Park
Before and After: Verdugo Wash east of Griffith Park

Support Provided By
Read More
EFEFF 2023 Banner Image

2023 Earth Focus Environmental Film Festival: Tickets and Information

The 2023 Earth Focus Environmental Film Festival is a hybrid event on May 22-25, offering virtual screenings on the Eventive platform and in-person screenings at the Landmark Westwood Theatre in Los Angeles.
A protestor speaks through a megaphone at a car caravan in Bell Gardens, California

Bell Gardens Residents Fight for Rent Control

When California Latinas for Reproductive Justice first started organizing for rent control, some policymakers didn't see the connection between housing and health. In Bell Gardens, the fight for housing stability is the fight to address the environmental determinants of health.
A boy stands near his home that was flooded due to rising sea levels.

Solastalgia: Naming the Grief of Climate Change

The word "solastalgia" aims to capture the loss and grief tied to climate change. But these emotions are experienced differently across cultures. While new language like solastalgia can be useful, Indigenous scholars and a psychologist describe how it also may miss the nuances of Indigenous peoples' experiences.