Title

What's Keeping Tribes From Harnessing Their Wind Energy?

Summer of the Environment small logo

This article is a part of KCET and Link TV's “Summer of the Environment,” which offers a robust library of content on multiple platforms from June-August intended to ignite compassion and action for helping to save and heal our planet.

A wind turbine in White, South Dakota | Photo: Randy Geise, some rights reserved
A wind turbine in White, South Dakota | Photo: Randy Geise, some rights reserved

The Dakota Access Pipeline goes through some of the windiest parts of the Great Plains, and wind power generation in the Plains States has grown rapidly over the last decade. You might think that wind would offer a viable alternative to fossil fuel development for Plains tribes. But in the rush to develop wind power, the Native peoples of the Plains are being left behind.

[Skip to interactive map]

While private landowners have enjoyed nearly a decade of Obama-era incentives to develop wind energy, Plains tribes seeking to harness the wind blowing past their lands must contend with several unique obstacles to development that don’t face their neighbors.

Story continues below

Tribes endure extra layers of bureaucracy

Oglala Sioux tribal leaders of the the Rosebud Sioux reservation have been eager to build wind turbines on their lands for more than 20 years, and the tribe installed its own 750-kilowatt turbine in 2002 with help from the firm Native Energy. But plans for the larger Owl Feather War Bonnet wind power facility on the Rosebud Reservation were delayed for so long that the would-be buyers of the plant’s electricity backed out in 2008. That facility has yet to be built.

The Alex Little Soldier wind turbine on the Rosebud Reservation, the Great Plains' only large-scale tribal wind turbine | Photo: Native Energy
The Alex Little Soldier wind turbine on the Rosebud Reservation, the Great Plains' only large-scale tribal wind turbine | Photo: Native Energy

The reason for the delay? The federal Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), which has the legal power to approve or deny development on Indian reservations, sat on the Owl Feather War Bonnet project developers’ lease with the tribe for 18 months before approving it. By then, the tribe’s Power Purchase Agreements with two local utilities had expired.

A General Accounting Office report on the BIA’s tribal energy oversight found that the agency had cost Native communities millions of dollars in lost revenue due to delays and mismanagement.  

Rosebud tribal leaders still consider the 30 megawatt Owl Feather War Bonnet project viable, along with the planned 190-megawatt North Antelope Highlands wind project elsewhere on the reservation. But despite some reforms in the BIA’s lease approval process, both projects remain in limbo.

0-base-layer.png
Wind Alternatives | ALMA and Friends | Data Sources: 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie, U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Geological Survey, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Tiger Roads (2015), ESRI, National Hydrologic Dataset, Keystone Pipeline Washington Post, The Bismarck Tribune, Wind Data and Analysis Provided by AWS Truepower, LLC
Water Bodies
Lakes, ponds, rivers, streams, and reservoirs
Indigenous Lands
Lands either held or claimed by Native nations
8-9 MPH Wind @ 80m
Places with wind resources adequate for power generation
9+ MPH Wind @ 80m
Places with excellent wind resources for power generation
Urban Cores
Places with population densities higher than 1,000 per square mile
6-state-line.png
Dakota Access Pipeline
The 1,172-mile Dakota Access Pipeline would carry up to 450,000 barrels of oil per day through four states, crossing rivers that provide water for 17 million people downstream.
Opportunity Area (100-mile buffer)
Lands within a 100-mile radius of the Dakota Access Pipeline easement
9-text.png

Land ownership obstacles

Another issue delaying wind development on tribal lands is the complex nature of land ownership on some reservations. The 19th Century Dawes Act assigned commonly held land to individual Native people, and mandated that their descendants should inherit equal shares of the undivided land. Now, a single parcel might have thousands of co-owners, all of whom have to sign off on a project. (Imagine getting thousands of your relatives to agree on anything involving money.)

Some reservations are also checkerboarded with non-Native private land or federal lands, another impediment to wind development.

Complex land ownership makes it harder for wind companies to get funding for their projects in the planning stages, which can make it harder for even the most feasible projects to get off the ground.

Lots of wind potential, not much transmission | Map: National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Lots of wind potential, not much transmission | Map: National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Transmission shortages

Delays accentuate a third obstacle. Wind power makes the most financial sense in the rural Plains when the power is sold to consumers in cities. But transmission lines can be few and far between in the northern Plains, and tribes’ non-Native neighbors may well saturate that capacity with their own wind installations before the tribe can get its wind turbines built.

A startlingly small percentage of the nation’s wind energy comes from Native lands, despite the fact that tribal lands are disproportionately blessed with abundant winds. About two dozen Native villages in Alaska have installed wind turbines to help phase out their expensive diesel generators, and 25 wind turbines on the Campo Kumeyaay reservation in California sell power to San Diego, generating some income for the tribe as well.

That’s about it for significant wind development on Native lands in the US. On the Plains, the Cherokee Nation signed a lease late last year on 4,000 acres of tribal land near Newkirk, Oklahoma with wind developer PNE, and it looks as though that project may actually be built, bringing the tribe $1 million a year in lease fees.

Aside from that Cherokee project, Native wind development on the Plains is sparse, and limited to small projects such as the Standing Rock Reservation’s single turbine helping power that tribe’s Sitting Bull College.

Turbines in prairie pothole country, prime bird habitat. Possibly not the best place for wind power. | Photo: USFWS
Turbines in prairie pothole country, prime bird habitat. Possibly not the best place for wind power. | Photo: USFWS
Renewable Alternatives

Native environmental and cultural concerns

It would be a mistake to characterize all Native peoples on the Great Plains as wind power cheerleaders. Even ardent tribal supporters of windpower concede the notion that modern-day  turbines are obtrusive and can interfere with viewsheds, as well as cultural resources under threat from heavy equipment. The potential for wildlife mortalities from turbines is a significant concern as well, especially given the importance of hawks and eagles to many Plains tribes.

Not far from the Cherokee Nation, for instance, the Osage Nation has taken wind developers to court over harm to the tribe’s culturally important viewshed and local wildlife. “The prairie,” Osage Nation Principal Chief Geoffrey Standing Bear told Tulsa World, “is a rare and delicate and endangered ecosystem. And these wind farms are destroying it. We’re going to continue the fight.”

And outside the Plains, the Campo Kumeyaay has opposed at least one large proposed wind development on its lands, citing concerns about the environment and public safety.

Nonetheless, it seems inevitable that Great Plains tribes will become more involved in generating wind energy. Aside from the need for economic development on Native lands, which are some of the least affluent places in the country, Native people in the United States are the most likely demographic to live without any electrical power at all. Jumping from no electricity to 100 percent renewable electricity is a laudable goal indeed — as long as that jump happens in a way that works for Native people.

 

The majority of our funding comes from individuals like you. In addition to our many shows both streaming online and broadcasting to your television, we are dedicated to providing you with articles like this one. Many online journalism sites are moving to paid subscription models. We feel that it's important to continue to serve southern California and beyond with coverage of arts & culture, news, and extra stories to support our programs.

Public media stations need your support more than ever. Please, become a Member today and help us continue to serve you.

Keep Reading