Skip to main content

A Rundown of Legislators Taking Californians for a Ride (And Getting into Crashes)

Support Provided By

Most children are told not to talk to or accept car rides from strangers. Let me add one wrinkle to this cautionary list, which is applicable to Californians of any age, best not to accept a ride from a legislator.

Amid growing debate over whether taxpayers should foot most of the bill for California legislators' cars, gas and maintenance, now comes word that Department of Motor Vehicle examiners everywhere may have been too lenient when giving our lawmakers drivers licenses.

Our representatives are mired not only in partisan gridlock, but also in the kind that causes traffic jams. Over the past half decade, vehicle accident claims by lawmakers were well above the national average.

Even though I remember my drivers' education classes with the same fondness that many recall root canals, it seems some of our legislators could benefit from a quick refresher on driving safety. However, it is worth not only mentioning, but emphasizing, that legislators were not always at fault.

It won't help legislators' already dismal approval ratings much once Californians realize that some of our legislators aren't particularly apt at navigating the minefields of the state capitol or the streets of California. The inability of our lawmakers to agree on a budget solution or apparently in many cases to employ safe driving practices is, to say the least, problematic. Some of our legislators' car insurance claims are on us.

Over the last five years, lawmakers filed 122 claims, which in total cost the taxpayers over $765,000. In the majority of cases, however, the state owed less than $4,000 based on the legislator's claim. In addition, more than half of that total bill (almost $362,000) stemmed from one incident related to Senator Carole Migden's (D-San Francisco) erratic driving and rear ending of a vehicle which caused a chain reaction. A year earlier, Sen. Migden, hit a bus costing the state about $5,000. Sen. Migden has stated that the first incident might have been due to a reaction to leukemia treatments.

Another senator from San Francisco, Leland Yee (D) racked up about $34,000 in claims, the overwhelming majority of which was based on an accident in which his wife hit a disabled vehicle while bringing Sen. Yee to the airport. Yes, taxpayers may also foot the bill for incidents that occur when a lawmakers' family member is driving a state-provided vehicle.

Not to be outdone by senators, members of the assembly have also significantly contributed to the states' $765,000 tab. Assemblywoman Mary Salas' (D-Chula Vista) four claims (including colliding with another car, striking concrete guards and backing into a post) added about $28,000 to the state's tab.

Lest anyone think this problem does not stretch to both sides of the aisle, Assemblyman Rick Keene (R-Chico), filed claims costing the state approximately $25,000 based on six incidents, including rear ending another car, hitting a fixed object in a parking lot, and backing into a stationary object. Senator Mimi Walters (R-Laguna Hills) and Assemblyman Cameron Smyth (R-Santa Clarita) filed claims based on incidents involving hitting their personal vehicles with their state-provided vehicles.

Our lawmakers have done something in a bipartisan manner. Unfortunately, it was billing the taxpayers for car damage.

The question is whether taxpayers save money under the current system, which costs us about $1 million per year. Proponents of the status quo claim that it would be more expensive to reimburse lawmakers based on each mile of driving their own vehicles on state business. An independent commission that sets benefits and salaries of elected officials will meet next week to, among other things, decide this issue.

Support Provided By
Read More
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.