California Constitution, Altered Over 500 Times; U.S. Constitution, Only 27 | KCET
Title
California Constitution, Altered Over 500 Times; U.S. Constitution, Only 27
Last week our state's lower legislative house rejected a bill that would have made it harder to qualify and approve of initiatives that change California's constitution. Assemblyman Mike Gatto, a Democrat from Los Angeles, sponsored the bill that would have made an enormous amount of sense. Let's hope it comes back again, successfully passes both legislative houses, and is signed by the Governor. Here's why.
It is distressingly easy to amend our state constitution through a disturbingly broken process -- the ballot initiative process. A constitution should be a basic governing document. It should be difficult to alter it. It should be altered only after an open, deep, and thorough debate. Ours is not; it has been amended well over 500 times. It is one of the most bloated constitutions in modern history. Compare our state constitution, in existence for 133 years, to our federal constitution, in existence for 223 years: It has been amended only 27 times.
The ballot initiative process simply makes it far too easy to propose, qualify, and pass citizen-initiated laws. Gatto's bill would have required more voter signatures to qualify initiatives. Further, his proposal would have required that constitutional amendments pass by a vote of 55 percent of voters taking part in the election in which the measure appeared on the ballot.
Gatto's proposal was quite rationale. Constitutional amendments should not pass by a simple majority of those who show up to the polls in any given election.
We live in a representative democracy. The ballot initiative process was designed as a safety valve for citizens when the legislative process failed to function properly. Now, because the initiative process is largely dominated by the same special interests we created the process to guard against, both the legislative and initiative processes are in need of serious reform.
Gatto's proposal would have been a step in the right direction.
Jessica Levinson writes about the intersection of law and government every Monday. She is an Associate Clinical Professor at Loyola Law School. Read more of her posts here.
Support the Articles you Love
We are dedicated to providing you with articles like this one. Show your support with a tax-deductible contribution to KCET. After all, public media is meant for the public. It belongs to all of us.
Keep Reading
-
Ticket Giveaways
Arts & Entertainment
Arts & Entertainment
Ticket Giveaway: Leonard Bernstein at 100
Enter to win a pair of tickets to see Leonard Bernstein at 100 at the Skirball Cultural Center.
Ticket Giveaway: Leonard Bernstein at 100
-
SoCal Connected
SoCal Connected
Trump Lawyer Ordered to Declare if He'll Plead the 5th in Stormy Daniels Case
President Donald Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, who is under criminal investigation, was ordered Friday to file a declaration in Los Angeles federal court stating if he plans to assert his Fifth Amendment right to avoid testifying in a lawsuit
L.A. Federal Judge Considers Bid to Delay Stormy Daniels Suit Against Trump
-
recipes
Pati's Mexican Table
Pati's Mexican Table
Recipe: Oaxacan Sour
Learn how to prepare Oaxacan Sours from "Pati's Mexican Table."
Recipe: Oaxacan Sour
-
Visual Arts
Artbound
Visual Arts
Motherhood Opens Artist Eyes to New, Exciting Materials
There’s a long and glorious tradition of artists turning to their immediate surroundings for the materials with which to make their work. So when an artist becomes a parent, specifically a mom, why not expect the same kinds of investigations?
Motherhood and Materiality: Artists Consider Their Altered, Cluttered Surroundings
- 1 of 44
- next ›
Comments