Skip to main content

California Legislators Want Their Gifts

Support Provided By
legislators-gift

Last week California lawmakers killed a bill that would have prohibited them (and members of their families and other officials) from accepting certain gifts from lobbyists and their employers. Those seeking to curry favor with Golden State legislators take note. The gates of access remain open, for some.

The state Senate Appropriations Committee, which prohibited the bill from even being put to a floor vote of our lawmakers, said the cost of enforcing the restrictions (an estimated $204,000) was too expensive. Of course, what lawmakers failed to consider is that the cost of fines could essentially cover the cost of policing the restrictions.

Disclosure statements show that our public servants accepted well over half a million dollars in gifts in 2010. The ban would have covered many of those gifts, including tickets to amusements parks, sporting events, and concerts. The bill also would have extended to spa treatments and fishing and golfing trips, among other things.

Under current law, a lobbyist's employer can give each official a gift worth $420 each year. Lobbyists can give a state official no more than $10 per month.

Alas Republican State Senator's bill, SB-18, is unlikely to see a floor vote or the light of day. The Appropriations Committee has seen to that. It is in the ominous "suspense file," which in this case is the place where good government reforms go to die.

Legislators, whose approval ratings are at all time lows, have once again failed to take any steps to attempt to build public trust and support. Why should the public's perception of their elected officials, and the integrity of governmental processes stand in the way of a good seat to a Dodger game or a nice day at the spa?

In a time of such skepticism about our public officials, when so many feel officials serve those with money first, and those who vote second, Senate Bill 18 would have been a step in the right direction. California's political watchdog, the Fair Political Practices Commission, is considering similar regulations. As a member of the California electorate, I hope those pass. Legislators seem unwilling to police themselves.

Jessica Levinson writes about the intersection of law and government every Monday. She is an Adjunct Professor at Loyola Law School and the Director of Political Reform at a non-profit, non-partisan think tank.

The photo used on this post is by Flickr user JD Hancock. It was used under a Creative Commons License.

Support Provided By
Read More
An oil pump painted white with red accents stands mid-pump on a dirt road under a blue, cloudy sky with a green, grassy slope in the background.

California’s First Carbon Capture Project: Vital Climate Tool or License to Pollute?

California’s first attempt to capture and sequester carbon involves California Resources Corp. collecting emissions at its Elk Hills Oil and Gas Field, and then inject the gases more than a mile deep into a depleted oil reservoir. The goal is to keep carbon underground and out of the atmosphere, where it traps heat and contributes to climate change. But some argue polluting industries need to cease altogether.
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.