Can Californians Gamble Their Way Out of the Budget Deficit? | KCET
Can Californians Gamble Their Way Out of the Budget Deficit?
No, but revenue from taxing online gambling could bring in some much needed money -- perhaps hundreds of millions of dollars -- to the golden state. According to a Field Poll released last week, a majority of California voters -- 53 percent -- support the legalization and taxing of Internet poker. Support for this proposal is highest -- at 73 percent -- among voters under 40 years old. In addition, more Democrats and Independents than Republicans support the idea of licensing online gambling and taxing its proceeds.
Support for the legalizing of taxing of online gambling may represent a larger voter sentiment in favor of so-called "sin taxes." Members of the electorate typically favor taxing revenue from bad or questionable behavior, such as smoking and marijuana use. Whether online gambling falls into that category in the minds of California voters is unclear.
Our lawmakers have floated the idea of legalizing and taxing Internet gambling for years. However, proposals have been mired in fighting between gambling interests. Perhaps that squabbling will soon end. Owners of racetracks, card rooms, and Indian casinos are slated to meet soon to hash out a compromise and present that compromise to our lawmakers.
Critics of such proposals worry about the consequences of legalizing online gambling. It could make it easier for ill-experienced players to bet too much and could be harmful for those with gambling additions. However, gambling is already legal in portions of the state, and our neighboring state of Nevada. While online gambling will make it easier for many to wager unwisely, it does not present a new option would-be gamblers.
While fears about consequences to individual gamblers are not unwarranted, neither are worries about the state's lack of funds. We need money, now. This is not a time when we can be picky about the source of revenue coming into the state.
Jessica Levinson writes about the intersection of law and government every Monday. She is a Visiting Professor at Loyola Law School.
The campaign against Proposition 187 was a call to action for many people from all walks of life. For those with years of legal training, it was signal to use their training to support the immigrant community. For students, it was an awakening.
Perceptions of public safety impact the physical and mental well-being of residents. In communities like South Los Angeles, racial profiling by police and unequal law enforcement tactics have large impacts for public health.
Indian garment workers say they are being made to compensate their bosses for the food, shelter and salary provided in the coronavirus lockdown.
You’ve seen it before: a group with an inoffensive name implores voters to support certain candidates or props. The catch is that many mailers blur the line between endorsement, paid advertisement and extortion, but that may change soon.
- 1 of 384
- next ›