Skip to main content

What has Redevelopment Done for Inglewood?

Support Provided By
Outside The Forum in Inglewood | Photo by John Moore/Getty Images

Now that it looks like Madison Square Garden will indeed acquire the ailing Forum, I'm moving past my relief that the place won't become a parking lot or mixed-use development from hell, and wondering about the details of this deal. Basically I'm trying to figure out if the acquisition will ultimately do anything for the ailing city of Inglewood itself.

Columnist Betty Pleasant of the Wave newspaper raised excellent points about this in a column last month. First there's the fact that part of MSG's deal is an $18 million loan from the city of Inglewood's Community Redevelopment Agency. To begin with, CRA's were shuttered by the state earlier this year, raising questions about the timing of this. CRA projects that were under way by January 2011 were allowed to go forward, but the Inglewood city council only approved the $18 million in January 2012. Even if this loan qualifies, the appropriateness of the loan is another matter. CRA money is meant to attract developers, but is this an incentive to a developer or a giveaway? Nor is Madison Square Garden building anything, just taking something over. Inglewood Mayor James Butts argued in Pleasant's column that the $18 million is meant to keep MSG from going somewhere else. But the Forum isn't a prospective Target or a Wal-Mart; it's a unique property with a specific purpose that can't be acquired just any place.

Also I began thinking about the CRA in Inglewood generally -- what has the agency really done all the years that it had to do things? What are the other projects with CRA involvement begun prior to 2011 that are finishing up? I haven't heard of one. In all my years living here I've never seen any construction signs around announcing a CRA project. I've always been frustrated by the lack of redevelopment of Market Street, Inglewood's historic and sizeable downtown that used to be a retail center/gathering place but has long since been overgrown by swap meets and such. Years ago I sat down with Inglewood's CRA director who confessed that Inglewood had been steadily undone by the successful redevelopment of downtowns in more affluent neighboring places like Culver City and new "lifestyle center" projects like the Bridge in the Howard Hughes Center on Sepulveda. And there was the entire mall culture of the South Bay stretching from Manhattan Beach to Palos Verdes. He implied that because of all this activity, Inglewood had no real shot at development itself. It was essentially an orphan.

I remember being agitated at this analysis -- if that's what city officials thought of the city, they should all be fired. I know that deals are tough to make in "undesireable" communities like South Central and Inglewood, which are still living in the shadow of the civil unrest of 1992. I get the color-tinged politics of it. But that's even more reason why we need vision from local leaders and electeds whose job it is to make the successful argument that Inglewood is not only profitable, but desirable, a place of the future. I'm not asking to be Manhattan Beach, but I am asking not be sold short.

Butts also said that the "loan" will be repaid by MSG investing $50 million to rehab the Forum and make it into a major entertainment center that will draw people and business to Inglewood. That sounds good, but history is against the idea. We had the Forum for decades and even at its peak, the city failed to capitalize on all the traffic it created. People came and left, spent their money at the Forum and nowhere else -- not that there were a lot of places in town to spend it. It's been well-established that sports venues located in urban areas tend not to do much economically for the 'hood; a few concession jobs here and there, and that's it. The key is transforming the area around the venue itself so that it becomes part of the game or the event that people trek over here to see. Inglewood Live, anyone?

Journalist and op-ed columnist Erin Aubry Kaplan's first-person accounts of politics and identity in Los Angeles, with an eye towards the city's African American community, appear every Thursday on KCET's SoCal Focus blog. Read all her posts here.

Support Provided By
Read More
Gray industrial towers and stacks rise up from behind the pitched roofs of warehouse buildings against a gray-blue sky, with a row of yellow-gold barrels with black lids lined up in the foreground to the right of a portable toilet.

California Isn't on Track To Meet Its Climate Change Mandates. It's Not Even Close.

According to the annual California Green Innovation Index released by Next 10 last week, California is off track from meeting its climate goals for the year 2030, as well as reaching carbon neutrality by 2045.
A row of cows stands in individual cages along a line of light-colored enclosures, placed along a dirt path under a blue sky dotted with white puffy clouds.

A Battle Is Underway Over California’s Lucrative Dairy Biogas Market

California is considering changes to a program that has incentivized dairy biogas, to transform methane emissions into a source of natural gas. Neighbors are pushing for an end to the subsidies because of its impact on air quality and possible water pollution.
A Black woman with long, black brains wears a black Chicago Bulls windbreaker jacket with red and white stripes as she stands at the top of a short staircase in a housing complex and rests her left hand on the metal railing. She smiles slightly while looking directly at the camera.

Los Angeles County Is Testing AI's Ability To Prevent Homelessness

In order to prevent people from becoming homeless before it happens, Los Angeles County officials are using artificial intelligence (AI) technology to predict who in the county is most likely to lose their housing. They would then step in to help those people with their rent, utility bills, car payments and more so they don't become unhoused.